-
-
News
News Highlights
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueLearning to Speak ‘Fab’
Our expert contributors clear up many of the miscommunication problems between PCB designers and their fab and assembly stakeholders. As you will see, a little extra planning early in the design cycle can go a long way toward maintaining open lines of communication with the fab and assembly folks.
Training New Designers
Where will we find the next generation of PCB designers and design engineers? Once we locate them, how will we train and educate them? What will PCB designers of the future need to master to deal with tomorrow’s technology?
The Designer of the Future
Our expert contributors peer into their crystal balls and offer their thoughts on the designers and design engineers of tomorrow, and what their jobs will look like.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

Beyond Design: Transmission Line Losses
As digital systems evolve and demand for new technology pushes the envelope for smaller and faster systems, transmission line losses, previously considered to be negligible, are becoming a primary design concern. Pragmatic effects such as frequency-dependent losses come into play at clock frequencies above 1 GHz and are of particular concern for fast rise time signals, with long trace lengths, such as multigigabit serial links. This frequency dependence causes rise time degradation and reduces the upper bandwidth of the signal resulting in reduced channel data transfer. In this month’s column, I will look at the impact of transmission line losses on signal integrity.
In an ideal world, where transmission line losses are independent of frequency, the entire signal waveform would uniformly decrease in amplitude, over distance, and the rise time would remain constant. This reduction in amplitude could easily be compensated for by applying gain (cranking up the volume) at the receiver. However, in practice, as signals propagate along a lossy transmission line, the amplitude of the high-frequency components is reduced, in magnitude, whereas the low-frequency components are unaffected. This selective attenuation of high-frequency components is the root cause of intersymbol interference (ISI) and collapse of the signal eye.
The capacitive and inductive properties of the transmission line do not, in themselves, absorb the high-frequency components of the signal but rather, the energy is reflected back to the source creating ringing and overshoot unless absorbed by a source termination.
To quantify the RF losses of a transmission line, one needs to consider the attenuation of each mechanism that can be broken down into at least four major components that are accumulated: metal loss, dielectric loss, conductivity of the dielectric and stray radiation.
The flow of charge through a material causes energy dissipation. The loss in both microstrip (outer layer) and stripline (inner layer) conductors may be broken down into two components: DC and AC losses. DC, in this context, is anything below 1 MHz. Although DC losses are not generally applicable to high-speed design, resistive drops can encroach on logic threshold levels and noise margins of multi-drop systems such as long DDR3/4 address, command and control bus routing associated with SODIMM memory modules. However, on-board memory has typically less than three inches of signal length, and as such does not exhibit this issue.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the July 2017 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.
More Columns from Beyond Design
Beyond Design: Key SI Considerations for High-speed PCB DesignBeyond Design: Electro-optical Circuit Boards
Beyond Design: AI-driven Inverse Stackup Optimization
Beyond Design: High-speed Rules of Thumb
Beyond Design: Integrated Circuit to PCB Integration
Beyond Design: Does Current Deliver the Energy in a Circuit?
Beyond Design: Termination Planning
Beyond Design: Dielectric Material Selection Guide